Gender-responsive sentencing for women defendants in Indonesia: Integrating living law and feminist legal reasoning https://doi.org/10.35719/an-nisa.v19i1.464 Authors Abdul Mutalib Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia Pujiyono Pujiyono Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia Sukirno Sukirno Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia Rahmat Hi. Abdullah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Ternate, North Maluku, Indonesia Ota Musashi University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Living Law, Feminist Legal Reasoning, Gender-Responsive Sentencing, Women Defendants, Indonesian National Criminal Code Abstract How to Cite Metrics References Similar Articles Women defendants in Indonesia frequently experience double victimization, functioning simultaneously as offenders and as victims of domestic violence, sexual exploitation, and economic pressure rooted in asymmetrical gender power relations. This study examines how living law, interpreted through constitutional values and feminist legal reasoning, can be operationalized to enable gender-responsive sentencing for women defendants in Indonesia. Using a normative-juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and doctrinal-analytical approaches, the study analyzes legal materials through grammatical, teleological, and systematic interpretation. The findings reveal three main points. First, Article 2 extends the principle of legality into a material dimension through a constitutional filter that ensures gender responsiveness and rejects discriminatory customary legal practices. Second, Article 54 provides space for gender-responsive sentencing by allowing consideration of women’s victimization and structural conditions. Third, the study develops a Gender-Responsive Living Law Model that integrates living law and feminist legal reasoning into a structured, measurable, and accountable judicial process. The study concludes that Articles 2 and 54 of the National Criminal Code provide a normative framework for gender-responsive sentencing through a constitutional filter against discriminatory practices. However, its effectiveness depends on the application of a structured and integrative model to ensure that judicial discretion remains measurable and accountable. This study contributes to gender and socio-legal studies by integrating living law and feminist legal reasoning into an operational framework for criminal adjudication in Indonesia. Mutalib, A., Pujiyono, P., Sukirno, S., Abdullah, R. H., & Musashi, O. (2026). Gender-responsive sentencing for women defendants in Indonesia: Integrating living law and feminist legal reasoning. An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies, 19(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.35719/an-nisa.v19i1.464 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Downloads Download data is not yet available. References Abdrasulov, E. B., Sarpekov, R. K., Tursynbekova, S., Rahmetulin, A. D., & Zoll, F. (2025). Constitutionalization of the principle of gender equality in the legislation of different countries. International Annals of Criminology, 63(4), 625. https://doi.org/10.1017/cri.2025.10093 Adhari, A., Widyawati, A., Windia, W., Hutabarat, R. R., & Tania, N. (2021). Customary delict of Penglipuran Bali in the perspective of the principle of legality: A dilemma and arrangements for the future. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 6(2), 411. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i2.50555 Akano, O. (2025). Gender, the offender, and the criminal justice system. CrimRxiv. https://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.9043b380 Ambel, K. P. (2025). Gendering justice in the Chilean courts: Institutional developments and legal actors’ perspectives. Latin American Research Review, 1. https://doi.org/10.1017/lar.2024.72 Anwar, R., Faisal, F., & Agustin, R. A. (2021). Perspective of religious justice in the formulation of penal reform. Cepalo, 5(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.25041/cepalo.v5no1.2240 Ariyanti, V. (2020). Equity sebagai dasar pertimbangan putusan hakim dalam menyelesaikan perkara pidana perempuan. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v5.i1.p63-84 Barlian, A. E. A., & Arief, B. N. (2017). Formulasi ide permaafan hakim (rechterlijk pardon) dalam pembaharuan sistem pemidanaan di Indonesia. Law Reform, 13(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v13i1.15949 Budianto, A. (2020). Legal research methodology reposition in research on social science. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1339–1346. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.154 Campos, G. S. de Q., & Bussinguer, E. C. de A. (2023). The sentencing principles of equality and proportionality from a feminist perspective: Exploring positive gender discrimination at sentencing. Beijing Law Review, 14(2), 854. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2023.142046 Chamallas, M. (2013). Introduction to feminist legal theory (3rd ed.). Wolters Kluwer Law & Business. Dancig-Rosenberg, H., & Dagan, N. (2019). Retributarianism: A new individualization of punishment. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 13(1), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-018-9460-2 Dwijayanto, R. A. (2026). Tinjauan yuridis perbandingan KUHP lama dan KUHP baru dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Teknologi, 6(2), 746. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v6i2.32705 Ehrlich, E. (1936). Fundamental principles of the sociology of law (W. L. Moll, Trans.; R. Pound, Intro.). Harvard University Press. Georgetown University Library Digital Collections. http://gull.georgetown.edu/record=b270997 Faisal, Yanto, A., Rahayu, D. P., Haryadi, D., Darmawan, A., & Manik, J. D. N. (2024). Genuine paradigm of criminal justice: Rethinking penal reform within Indonesia new criminal code. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), Article 2301634. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2301634 Febrianty, Y., Ishwara, A. S. S., Priambada, B. S., & Hulwanullah, H. (2023). The limitations of living law in Indonesian criminal law reform: An effort to realize justice. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i2.1232 Gill, C., Campbell, M. A., & Ballucci, D. (2021). Police officers’ definitions and understandings of intimate partner violence in New Brunswick, Canada. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, 94(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X20947238 Gregorio, E., Kusumastuti, D. A., & Kesuma, I. G. K. W. (2024). Implikasi pelunakan pengaturan asas legalitas dalam KUHPN terhadap konsep “hukum yang hidup dalam masyarakat.” Jurist-Diction, 7(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v7i2.56124 Halawa, Y. (2025). Hukum adat sebagai instrumen restorative justice dalam penyelesaian sengketa di masyarakat sebagai pembaharuan hukum nasional. RIO Law Jurnal. https://ojs.umb-bungo.ac.id/index.php/RIO/article/view/1837 Hellum, A., Ikdahl, I., & Strand, V. B. (2023). Between norms and institutions. In Routledge eBooks (p. 130). Informa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003172840-4 Hiariej, E. O. S., & Santoso, T. (2023). Anotasi KUHP nasional. Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia. Hulley, J., Bailey, L., Kirkman, G., Gibbs, G. R., Gomersall, T., Latif, A., & Jones, A. (2023). Intimate partner violence and barriers to help-seeking among Black, Asian, minority ethnic and immigrant women: A qualitative metasynthesis of global research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(2), 1001–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211050590 Kaur, H. (2025). Gendering of Indian judiciary as a roadmap towards an equitable legal system and progressive gender-sensitive jurisprudence. Frontiers in Sociology, 10, 1475043. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1475043 Komeni, W. H., & Widjajanti, E. (2024). Ketidaktepatan penerapan hukum pidana adat dalam Pasal 2 KUHP baru: Prespektif teori kepastian hukum. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(3), 1051. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i3.10586 Komnas Perempuan. (2018). CATAHU 2018: Tergerusnya ruang aman perempuan dalam pusaran politik populisme: Catatan kekerasan terhadap perempuan tahun 2017. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/catatan-tahunan-detail/catahu-2018-tergerusnya-ruang-aman-perempuan-dalam-pusaran-politik-populisme-catatan-kekerasan-terhadap-perempuan-tahun-2017? Komnas Perempuan. (2021). Siaran pers: Kesalahan penerapan hukum dalam kasus kriminalisasi korban KDRT di PN Karawang. https://komnasperempuan.go.id Komnas Perempuan. (2025). Siaran pers memperingati Hari Pemasyarakatan 2025. https://komnasperempuan.go.id Kuswandi, K., & Madianwati, S. S. (2025). Kriminologi feminis: Pendekatan untuk memahami kejahatan serta bentuk-bentuk ketidakadilan gender dalam perspektif hukum. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 3(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v3i2.5009 Londoño, P. A. V., González, M. E. N., Solera, C. B., & Paz, P. S. (2021). The exacerbation of violence against women as a form of discrimination in the period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Heliyon, 7(3), e06491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06491 Martínez-Bacaicoa, J., Real-Brioso, N., Mateos-Pérez, E., & Gámez-Guadix, M. (2024). The role of gender and sexism in the moral disengagement mechanisms of technology-facilitated sexual violence. Computers in Human Behavior, 152, 108060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108060 Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi, Cet. 13). Kencana Prenada Media Group. Masyhar, A., Aisy, R., Widyawati, A., Maskur, M. A., & Murtadho, A. (2025). Reclaiming the unwritten: Living law’s prospects under Indonesia’s 2023 penal reform. Jambe Law Journal, 8(1), 255. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v8i1.502 Mertokusumo, S. (2014). Penemuan hukum: Sebuah pengantar (Edisi revisi). Cahaya Atma Pustaka. Mulyadi, L. (2013). Eksistensi hukum pidana adat di Indonesia: Pengkajian asas, norma, teori, praktik dan prosedurnya. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 2(2), 225. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.225-246 Ningrumsari, F. D., Azisa, N., & Heryani, W. (2022). Paradigma teori hukum feminis terhadap peraturan perlindungan hukum bagi perempuan korban kekerasan seksual di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.30997/jill.v14i1.4704 Nova, E. (2023). Penerapan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian tindak kekerasan terhadap perempuan dan anak sebagai perwujudan hak asal usul di Sumatera Barat. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(2), 817. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.383 Nurcahyo, N., Ricky, R., & Manitra, R. R. M. (2024). Reform of the criminal law system in Indonesia which prioritizes substantive justice. Journal of Law Environmental and Justice, 2(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v2i1.91 Nurlaelawati, E., & Witriani. (2023). Cultural expertise in Islamic courts in Indonesia. In Routledge eBooks (p. 329). Informa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003167075-34 Penovic, T., & Debeljak, J. (2024). Re-charting the Victorian Charter of Human Rights. In Routledge eBooks (p. 81). Informa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003372462-9 Plesničar, M. M. (2013). The individualization of punishment: Sentencing in Slovenia. European Journal of Criminology, 10(4), 462–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370812469858 Salamor, Y. B., Purwanti, A., & Rochaeti, N. (2024). Pengaturan tentang femisida dalam hukum pidana Indonesia: Kajian perbandingan UU HAM dan UU TPKS. Litigasi, 25(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v25i1.12520 Savitri, N., & Gunarsa, A. (2008). HAM perempuan: Kritik teori hukum feminis terhadap KUHP. https://lib.pdii.lipi.go.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=506688&keywords= Seear, K., & Mulcahy, S. (2021). Enacting safety and omitting gender: Australian human rights scrutiny processes concerning alcohol and other drug laws. Contemporary Drug Problems, 49(3), 258. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914509211065141 Tongat. (2022). The ambiguous authority of living law application in new Indonesian penal code: Between justice and the rule of law. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 17(2), 188–209. https://ijcjs.com/menu-script/index.php/ijcjs/article/view/529 United Nations General Assembly. (2010). United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules) (Resolution 65/229). https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/united-nations-rules-treatment-women-prisoners-and-non-custodial Valerina, A. T., & Rismana, D. (2024). Living law in modern legal systems: Challenges to the principle of legality. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 6(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2024.6.1.22062 Zaltina, P. E., & Nurtjahyo, L. I. (2024). Right to be forgotten as a legal protection for the victims of electronic sexual violence cases. Indonesian Journal of Socio-Legal Studies, 3(2), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.54828/ijsls.2024v3n2.4 Downloads Full Text (English) 2026-07-05 Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): An-Nisa' Journal of Gender Studies Section Articles Copyright (c) 2026 Abdul Mutalib, Pujiyono Pujiyono, Sukirno Sukirno, Rahmat Hi. Abdullah, Ota Musashi This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. How to Cite Mutalib, A., Pujiyono, P., Sukirno, S., Abdullah, R. H., & Musashi, O. (2026). Gender-responsive sentencing for women defendants in Indonesia: Integrating living law and feminist legal reasoning. An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies, 19(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.35719/an-nisa.v19i1.464 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX