Deconstructing gender norms in pesantren: a critical etnographic study of the pesantren curriculum in Indonesia https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v18i2.367 Authors Ach Barocky Zaimina Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, Indonesia Asnawan Asnawan Universitas Al-Falah Assunniyyah Jember, Indonesia Anuwat Sohwang Rungrotewittaya School Chana Songkhla, Thailand Gender Norms, Pesantren Curriculum, Critical Ethnography, Patriarchy Abstract How to Cite Metrics References Similar Articles Pesantren in Indonesia maintain traditional gender structures through formal and non-formal curricula, reproducing male dominance, limiting female participation, and reinforcing patriarchal hierarchies amid rapid social change. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of gender power reproduction and contestation in three pesantren in East Java through a critical ethnographic approach, tracing layered patriarchy and symbolic agency within pedagogical practices and the pesantren curriculum. This study employed a critical ethnographic approach with a case study design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 10 informants and analyses of curriculum documents. Data analysis applied Carspecken’s critical ethnographic framework, supported by source triangulation, theoretical triangulation, and ideological critique. The findings revealed four main issues: (1) pesantren curricula reproduce gender inequality through patriarchal roles and vertical power relations; (2) resistance emerges through progressive female teachers, critical students, and informal learning groups; (3) gender-responsive curricula are hindered by monolithic religious content, patriarchal structures, and limited teacher competence; and (4) minimal representation of female Islamic scholars limits students’ recognition of women as religious role models. The study demonstrates that pesantren reproduce patriarchy through curricula, institutional structures, and symbolic representations, while resistance from female teachers and students remains largely symbolic due to the absence of sustainable structural reform. This study contributes to expanding the concept of patriarchal habitus and proposes a pesantren patriarchy contestation model through curriculum reform, critical pedagogy, inclusive policies, and strengthening women’s participation toward sustainable structural transformation. Zaimina, A. B., Asnawan, A., & Sohwang, A. (2025). Deconstructing gender norms in pesantren: a critical etnographic study of the pesantren curriculum in Indonesia. An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies , 18(2), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v18i2.367 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Downloads Download data is not yet available. References Ali, P. A., & Naylor, P. B. (2013). Intimate partner violence: A narrative review of the feminist, social and ecological explanations for its causation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(6), 611–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2013.07.009 Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. SAGE Publications. Ansori, A., Zein, U. N., & Umam, L. H. (2025). Santri’s perceptions of discomfort in the learning environment and its impact on cognitive barriers in Arabic language learning. Al-Himam: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pendidikan & Bahasa Arab, 4(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.51590/alhimam.v4i2.1070 Arquisola, M. J., & Rentschler, R. (2023). Gendered in-role behaviours of Indonesian university leaders: Experiences and voices. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2170106 Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034006003 Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 Carspecken, F.P. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315021263 Cislaghi, B., & Heise, L. (2020). Gender norms and social norms: differences, similarities and why they matter in prevention science. Sociology of health & illness, 42(2), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13008 Dema, S. (2008). Gender and organizations: The (re)production of gender inequalities within development NGOs. Women’s Studies International Forum, 31(6), 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2008.09.007 Dewangga, D. P. W., Budianto, S., & Wijaya, K. (2025). Fairclough’s three dimensions critical discourse analysis of Malcolm X’s speech at Oxford Union debate. Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu, 3(3), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.59435/gjmi.v3i3.1475 Edgerton, J. D., & Roberts, L. W. (2014). Cultural capital or habitus? Bourdieu and beyond in the explanation of enduring educational inequality. Theory and Research in Education, 12(2), 193-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878514530231 Fauzi, R., & Zebua, A. M. (2020). Pesantren and the development of gender-aware Islamic studies. Hikmah, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.53802/hikmah.v17i1.39 Fitriyah, A., & Rahman, G. (2024). Reinterpreting gender in the Qur’an: Realizing inclusive interpretation in the modern era. An-Nisa Journal of Gender Studies, 17(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v17i2.303 Fitriyah, A., Haryanti, N. D., Fadhilla, I., & Utama, V. R. (2023). Gender dynamics and digital literacy in pesantren creative writing. EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama dan Keagamaan, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v22i2.1747 Fotaki, M., & Pullen, A. (2023). Feminist theories and activist practices in organization studies. Organization Studies, 45(4), 593-616. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231209861 Galsanjigmed, E., & Sekiguchi, T. (2023). Challenges women experience in leadership careers: An integrative review. Merits, 3(2), 366-389. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3020021 Ghimire, N. B. (2021). Review on ethical issues in ethnographic study: Some reflections. Contemporary Research: An Interdisciplinary Academic Journal, 5(1), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.3126/craiaj.v5i1.40485 Guo, D., Ramos, R. L. M., & Wang, F. (2024). Qualitative online interviews: Voices of applied linguistics researchers. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100130 Gupta, M., Madabushi, J. S., & Gupta, N. (2023). Critical overview of patriarchy, its interferences with psychological development, and risks for mental health. Cureus, 15(6), e40216. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.40216 Haugaard, M. (2022). Foucault and Power: A Critique and Retheorization. Critical Review, 34(3–4), 341–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2022.2133803 Hora, E. A. (2014). Factors that affect women participation in leadership and decision making position. Asian Journal of Humanity, Art and Literature, 1(2), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.18034/ajhal.v1i2.287 Kabeer, N. (2016). Gender, labor markets and women’s empowerment: An overview. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 36(7/8), 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-02-2016-0023 Kark, R., & Buengeler, C. (2024). Wo∼men and leadership: Re-thinking the state of research on gender and leadership through waves of feminist thinking. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 31(3), 245-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518241257105 Kurniawati, A., & Muafiah, E. (2023). Gender equality and justice in the pesantren environment. Excelencia: Journal of Islamic Education & Management, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.21154/excelencia.v3i01.1478 Kuteesa, K., Akpuokwe, C., & Udeh, C. (2024). Gender equity in education: Addressing challenges and promoting opportunities for social empowerment. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(4), 631–641. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i4.1034 Lindell, J. (2022). Symbolic violence and the social space: Self-imposing the mark of disgrace? Cultural Sociology, 16(3), 379-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755221082375 Liu, Y. (2023). Virtues or talent among brotherless daughters: A study of how patriarchal gender ideals affect gender role attitudes among women from the one-child generation in China. Sociology, 58(1), 175-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385231160033 Malihah, E., Nurbayani, S., Wilodati, & Wulandari, P. (2023). Islamic boarding school based on women's empowerment and equality. Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 15(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v15i1.39561 Martínez-Valdivia, E., Pegalajar-Palomino, M. C., & Amber-Montes, D. (2024). Evaluation of the impact of dialogic pedagogical gatherings on sustainable development training for future teachers. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2332837 McGrath, C., & Hand, C. (2021). Engagement in the social context of the neighbourhood: A critical ethnographic study of older adults with age-related vision loss. Wellbeing, Space and Society, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2021.100041 Morison, T., & Macleod, C. (2013). A performative-performance analytical approach: Infusing butlerian theory into the narrative-discursive method. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(8), 566-577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413494344 Nadhifah, A. M., & Pramono, M. S. (2025). Negotiating liminal identity and women’s empowerment in pesantren salaf. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 19(2), 365–400. https://doi.org/10.14421/h6f33e86 Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789 Nasheeda, A., Abdullah, H. B., Krauss, S. E., & Ahmed, N. B. (2019). Transforming transcripts into stories: A multimethod approach to narrative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919856797 Nikjoo, A., Seyfi, S., & Saarinen, J. (2025). Promoting gender inclusivity through community based tourism. Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, 6(1), 100181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annale.2025.100181 Nisa’u, F. I., & Karsidi, R. (2025). Symbolic power and the discursive construction of obedience: Media representations of Kiai–Santri relations in the context of Bida’ah series. Fikri: Jurnal Kajian Agama, Sosial dan Budaya, 10(1), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.25217/jf.v10i1.6252 Nurfai, A. (2022). Pendidikan kesetaraan gender di pondok pesantren sebagai upaya membangun peradaban bangsa. Wawasan: Jurnal Kediklatan Balai Diklat Keagamaan Jakarta, 3(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.53800/wawasan.v3i2.162 Ong, S. H., Beaumont, M., Caine, V., & Slemon, A. (2024). Selecting approaches for discourse analysis: Thoughts on nursing research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241299658 Pierik, B. (2022). Patriarchal power as a conceptual tool for gender history. Rethinking History, 26(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2022.2037864 Prasmiwardana, Y. D., Rahmawati, E., Ikhwan, H., Elista, A., & Budiman, A. M. (2025). Women leadership in navigating self-sufficient transformational and transactional leadership in an islamic context. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2025.2496219 Rahman, Y. (2017). Feminist kyai, K.H. Husein Muhammad: The feminist interpretation on gendered verses and the Qur’ān-based activism. Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 55(2), 293-326. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2017.552.293-326 Safitri, E., Alkhowarizmi, A., Luthfi, R., Putri, N., & Fazriani, E. (2025). Maintaining traditions in the midst of the current era: Adaptive strategies of islamic boarding schools to modernization. Jurnal Studi Sosial Keagamaan Syekh Nurjati, 5(1), 98-116. https://doi.org/10.24235/sejati.v5i1.101 Salim, L. (2020). Kontruksi sosial gender di pesantren: Studi kesenjangan antara laki-laki dengan perempuan. Jurnal Sosio Religia, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24042/sr.v1i2.8415 Sanah, B. F., Nafisah, I. W., Mukmina, M. Z., Cholid, S. A., & Prayoga, T. A. (2021). Implementasi keadilan gender di Pondok Pesantren Sabilurrosyad Kota Malang. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 16(1), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsr.v16i1.1774 Shallaita, B., Nawawi, N., & Amin, M. (2021). Analysis of English language teaching materials on gender representation. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(2), 419. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i2.2423 Slemon, A. (2025). Absences and silences in critical discourse analysis: Methodological reflections. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251321250 Srimulyani, E. (2007). Muslim women and education in Indonesia: The pondok pesantren experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 27(1), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790601145564 Stack, R. (2020). An analysis of Muslim women’s rights based on the works of Amina Wadud, Fatima Mernissi, and Riffat Hassan (Master’s thesis, Harvard Extension School). Harvard University. https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37365037 Subaidi, A. T., Cholid, N., Junaedi, M., Waluyo, & Nursikin, M. (2023). Eco-pesantren: Islamic education in forest conservation landscapes. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 16(44), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-023-00386-w Suryadi, N., Pohan, A. J., & Khairurrijal, K. (2025). Pesantren and gender issues: Reinterpreting classical Fiqh to address contemporary gender equality challenges. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 15(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.38073/jpi.v15i1.2449 Vohra, N., Chari, V., Mathur, P., Sudarshan, P., Verma, N., Mathur, N., Thakur, P., Chopra, T., Srivastava, Y., Gupta, S., Dasmahapatra, V., Fonia, S., & Gandhi, H. K. (2015). Inclusive workplaces: Lessons from theory and practice. Vikalpa, 40(3), 324-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090915601515 Vu, M. T., & Pham, T. T. T. (2022). Gender, critical pedagogy, and textbooks: Understanding teachers’ (lack of) mediation of the hidden curriculum in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221136937 Wahyono. (2023). Ini sebaran pondok pesantren di Indonesia, tertarik jadi santri? SINDOnews.com. https://edukasi.sindonews.com/read/1155865/212/ini-sebaran-pondok-pesantren-di-indonesia-tertarik-jadi-santri-1689800851 Walsh, A., Murtagh, E. M., Aljanazrah, A., & Hamed, G. (2025). Modelling gender equity in the classroom: from teacher educators to pre-service teachers and what gets lost in translation. Oxford Review of Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2025.2477064 Wardiana, W., Fadli, A., & Masnun, M. (2024). Contribution of women in the education management of Islamic boarding school. Ulumuna, 28(1), 398-423. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v28i1.805 Zamzami, A. N., & Putri, D. T. (2024). Relevansi teori belajar humanistik carl rogers dalam pendidikan karakter perspektif Islam: The relevance of carl rogers’ humanistic learning theory in islamic perspective character education. Thawalib: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 5(2), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.54150/thawalib.v5i2.361 Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2021). Critical discourse analysis, critical discourse studies and beyond (Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology 26): by Theresa Catalano and Linda R. Waugh (eds.). Berlin, Springer, 2020, XXV+406 pp. €89.99, ISBN: 978-3-030-49377-6(hbk), €74.89, ISBN: 978-3-030-49379-0(ebk). Critical Discourse Studies, 19(4), 454–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2021.1918196 Downloads Full Text (English) 2025-12-03 Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): An-Nisa' Journal of Gender Studies Section Articles Copyright (c) 2025 Ach Barocky Zaimina, Asnawan Asnawan, Anuwat Sohwang This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. How to Cite Zaimina, A. B., Asnawan, A., & Sohwang, A. (2025). Deconstructing gender norms in pesantren: a critical etnographic study of the pesantren curriculum in Indonesia. An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies , 18(2), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v18i2.367 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX