Gendered division of labor and women’s double burden: A Bourdieusian perspective on rural plantation work https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v16i1.131 Authors Muhammad Arif Mustaqim Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, East Java, Indonesia Gender Division of Labor, Pierre Bourdieu, Habitus, Patriarchy Abstract How to Cite Metrics References Similar Articles Gender inequality within the family is evident in the unequal division of labor, where women engaged in productive work continue to bear a double burden because domestic responsibilities remain primarily assigned to them. This study aims to analyze how women’s dual roles in the domestic and productive spheres within the plantation sector are formed and reproduced within rural gender structures. This study employs a qualitative interpretative approach through field research involving observation, interviews, and documentation. Data were analyzed inductively using Bourdieu’s theoretical framework and validated through triangulation and member checking. The findings show that: (1) women perform dual roles, remaining primarily responsible for domestic work while also engaging in productive labor in the plantation sector, whereas men remain positioned as the main breadwinners within rural gender structures; and (2) women’s productive work is reproduced through the interaction of patriarchal habitus, socio-cultural capital, and the social fields of the family and plantation, which continuously sustain gendered divisions of labor in rural life. The study concludes that women’s involvement in plantation work does not necessarily transform unequal gender relations. Women continue to bear a double burden, while patriarchal relations are reproduced through the interaction of habitus, capital, and social fields. Theoretically, this study contributes to Bourdieu’s perspective by demonstrating how internalized patriarchal dispositions contribute to the reproduction of gender inequality without direct coercion. Practically, it calls for critical gender education and village-level policies aimed at transforming internalized gender norms and promoting a more equitable distribution of domestic labor. Mustaqim, M. A. (2023). Gendered division of labor and women’s double burden: A Bourdieusian perspective on rural plantation work. An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies, 16(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v16i1.131 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Downloads Download data is not yet available. References Ali, P. A., & Naylor, P. B. (2013). Intimate partner violence: A narrative review of the feminist, social and ecological explanations for its causation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(6), 611–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2013.07.009 Anderson, C. L., Reynolds, T. W., Biscaye, P., Patwardhan, V., & Schmidt, C. (2021). Economic benefits of empowering women in agriculture: Assumptions and evidence. The Journal of Development Studies, 57(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2020.1769071 Arlinghaus, K. R., & Johnston, C. A. (2019). Identifying and addressing individuals resistant to behavioral lifestyle treatment. American journal of lifestyle medicine, 13(4), 354–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827619843117 Auspurg, K., Iacovou, M., & Nicoletti, C. (2017). Housework share between partners: Experimental evidence on gender-specific preferences. Social Science Research, 66, 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.01.003 Azungah, T. (2018). Qualitative research: Deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035 Belingheri, P., Chiarello, F., Fronzetti Colladon, A., & Rovelli, P. (2021). Twenty years of gender equality research: A scoping review based on a new semantic indicator. PloS one, 16(9), e0256474. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256474 Bose, G., Jain, T., & Walker, S. (2022). Women’s labor force participation and household technology adoption. European Economic Review, 147, 104181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104181 Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological research and practice, 2, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z Carlhed Ydhag, C., Månsson, N., & Osman, A. (2021). Momentums of success, illusio and habitus: High-achieving upper secondary students’ reasons for seeking academic success. International Journal of Educational Research, 109, Article 101805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101805 Chen, F., Bao, L., Lin, Z., Zimmer, Z., Gultiano, S., & Borja, J. B. (2018). Double burden for women in mid- and later life: evidence from time-use profiles in Cebu, the Philippines. Ageing and society, 38(11), 2325–2355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X17000599 Chigbu, U. E. (2019). Masculinity, men and patriarchal issues aside: How do women’s actions impede women’s access to land? Matters arising from a peri-rural community in Nigeria. Land Use Policy, 81, 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.033 Das, S., & Mishra, A. J. (2021). Dietary practices and gender dynamics: Understanding the role of women. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 8, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-021-00081-9 Farhall, K., & Rickards, L. (2021). The “gender agenda” in agriculture for development and its (lack of) alignment with feminist scholarship. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 573424. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.573424 Gurieva, S. D., Kazantseva, T. V., Mararitsa, L. V., & Gundelakh, O. E. (2022). Social perceptions of gender differences and the subjective significance of the gender inequality issue. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 15(2), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2022.0205 Hamlet, L., Gutierrez, V. B., Soto, A., & Dickin, S. (2022). Barriers to women's participation, leadership, and empowerment in community-managed water and sanitation in rural Bolivia. H2Open Journal, 5(3), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2022.021 Huggett, C., Da Costa Cruz, L., Goff, F., Pheng, P., & Ton, D. (2022). Beyond inclusion: Practical lessons on striving for gender and disability transformational changes in WASH systems in Cambodia and Timor-Leste. H2Open Journal, 5(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2022.039 Ikrami, R., & Fatmariza, F. (2021). Kehidupan perempuan buruh tani Mandailing. Journal of Civic Education, 4(3), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.24036/jce.v4i3.618 Jenderedjian, A., & Bellows, A. C. (2021). Rural poverty, violence, and power: Rejecting and endorsing gender mainstreaming by food security NGOs in Armenia and Georgia. World Development, 140, 105270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105270 Jespersen, L., & Wallace, C. A. (2017). Triangulation and the importance of establishing valid methods for food safety culture evaluation. Food Research International, 100(Part 1), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.009 Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M.-L., Lukka, K., & Kuorikoski, J. (2008). Straddling between paradigms: A naturalistic philosophical case study on interpretive research in management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2–3), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.12.003 Karima, F. H., Udasmoro, W., & Dewojati, C. (2022). Women’s narration in woman’s author in Bourdieu’s perspective. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2022) (pp. 190–196). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-91-6_29 Kelly, A. M. (2016). Social cognitive perspective of gender disparities in undergraduate physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 020116. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020116 Kinasih, S. R., & Wulandari, I. (2021). Pembagian kerja berdasarkan gender dalam pengelolaan agroforestri di Hulu DAS Citarum. Umbara, 6(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.24198/umbara.v6i1.33414 Krisdinanto, N. (2014). Pierre Bourdieu, sang juru damai: Pierre Bourdieu, the peaceful. Kanal: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 2(2), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.21070/kanal.v2i2.300 Kristiningrum, E., Ayundyahrini, M., Susanto, D. A., Setyoko, A. T., Kresiani, R. H., & Suparmanto, N. (2021). Quantifying the economic benefit of standard on auto-electric stove for batik small medium enterprises in Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(6), e07299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07299 Kusuma, N. (2021). Pembagian kerja antara suami dan istri dalam rumah tangga nelayan (Studi di Kampung Nelayan Pondok Perasi Kelurahan Bintaro). RESIPROKAL: Jurnal Riset Sosiologi Progresif Aktual, 3(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.29303/resiprokal.v3i1.61 Lawless, S., Cohen, P. J., Mangubhai, S., Kleiber, D., & Morrison, T. H. (2021). Gender equality is diluted in commitments made to small-scale fisheries. World Development, 140, 105348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105348 Lee, Y.-J. (2022). Lingering Male Breadwinner Norms as Predictors of Family Satisfaction and Marital Instability. Social Sciences, 11(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020049 Lizardo, O. (2004). The cognitive origins of Bourdieu's habitus. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34(4), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2004.00255.x MacKenzie, A., Chiang, T.-H., & Thurston, A. (2022). New insights on the persistence and reproduction of educational inequality and injustice: Towards a synthesis of Nussbaum's capabilities approach and Bourdieu's theories. International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 102032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102032 Maes, J., Wood, J., Marynissen, L., & Neels, K. (2022). The gender division of paid work over family formation: Variation by couples’ migration background. Advances in Life Course Research, 53, Article 100497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2022.100497 Mazei, J., Hüffmeier, J., Freund, P. A., Stuhlmacher, A. F., Bilke, L., & Hertel, G. (2015). A meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators. Psychological bulletin, 141(1), 85–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038184 Modell, S. (2005). Triangulation between case study and survey methods in management accounting research: An assessment of validity implications. Management Accounting Research, 16(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2005.03.001 Musarrofa, I. (2019). Pemikiran Pierre Bourdieu Tentang Dominasi Maskulin dan Sumbangannya Bagi Agenda Pengarusutamaan Gender di Indonesia. Kafa`Ah: Journal Of Gender Studies, 9(1), 34-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.15548/jk.v9i1.227 Nash, R. (1999). Bourdieu, “Habitus”, and educational research: Is it all worth the candle? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425699995399 Ninan, J. (2020). Online naturalistic inquiry in project management research: Directions for research. Project Leadership and Society, 1, Article 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2020.100002 Ningrum, W. T. P., & Mas’udah, S. (2021). Family conflicts and the violence of unemployed husbands against their wives acting as the main breadwinner. Jurnal Sosiologi Dialektika, 16(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.20473/jsd.v16i1.2021.76-85 Nohe, C., Hüffmeier, J., Bürkner, P.-C., Mazei, J., Sondern, D., Runte, A., Sieber, F., & Hertel, G. (2022). Unethical choice in negotiations: A meta-analysis on gender differences and their moderators. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 173, 104189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104189 Oktavia, T., Cikalkinanty, F., & Fakhruddin, A. (2022). Patriarchy culture in gender equality concept: Islamic perspective. Al-Mada: Jurnal Agama, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 5(1), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.31538/almada.v5i1.2010 Prastyowati, S. (2019). The study of gender inequality found in Deborah Ellis’s novel The Breadwinner. Jurnal Perempuan dan Anak, 2(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpa.v2i2.9661 Rimkute, A., & Sugiharti, L. (2022). The link between occupations, labor force participation of married women, and household technology in Indonesia. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 31, 20–37. retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jpss/article/view/257815 Ritzer, G. (2014). Teori sosiologi: Dari teori sosiologi klasik sampai perkembangan terakhir postmodern. Pustaka Pelajar. Ritzer, G., & Goodman, D. J. (2004). Teori sosial modern. Prenada Media. Ruslin, I. T. (2022). The way of a patriarchal bargain: how the bargain under the structure and agency perspective. ETNOSIA : Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 7(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.31947/etnosia.v7i2.21293 Sarkki, S., Dalla Torre, C., Fransala, J., Živojinović, I., Ludvig, A., Górriz-Mifsud, E., Melnykovych, M., Sfeir, P. R., Arbia, L., Bengoumi, M., Chorti, H., Gramm, V., López Marco, L., Ravazzoli, E., & Nijnik, M. (2021). Reconstructive social innovation cycles in women-led initiatives in rural areas. Sustainability, 13(3), Article 1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031231 Sato, P. de M., Gittelsohn, J., Unsain, R. F., Roble, O. J., & Scagliusi, F. B. (2016). The use of Pierre Bourdieu's distinction concepts in scientific articles studying food and eating: A narrative review. Appetite, 96, 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.010 Setiawan, E. (2017). Konstruksi sosial pembagian kerja dan pengupahan buruh tani. Yinyang: Jurnal Studi Islam, Gender dan Anak, 12(1), 19–34. https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/yinyang/article/view/1130 Sinclair, K., Thompson-Colón, T., Bastidas-Granja, A. M., Del Castillo Matamoros, S. E., Olaya, E., & Melgar-Quiñonez, H. (2022). Women’s autonomy and food security: Connecting the dots from the perspective of Indigenous women in rural Colombia. SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, 2, 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100078 Skarpenes, O. (2014). Education and the demand for emancipation. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(6), 713–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2013.840677 Turnbull, S. M., Locke, K., Vanholsbeeck, F., & O'Neale, D. R. J. (2019). Bourdieu, networks, and movements: Using the concepts of habitus, field and capital to understand a network analysis of gender differences in undergraduate physics. PloS one, 14(9), e0222357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222357 Uhlmann, A. J., & Uhlmann, J. R. (2005). Embodiment below discourse: The internalized domination of the masculine perspective. Women's Studies International Forum, 28(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2005.02.007 Vincent, K. (2022). A review of gender in agricultural and pastoral livelihoods based on selected countries in West and East Africa. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 908018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.908018 Yavorsky, J. E., Dush, C. M., & Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J. (2015). The Production of Inequality: The Gender Division of Labor Across the Transition to Parenthood. Journal of marriage and the family, 77(3), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12189 Zamberlan, A., Gioachin, F., & Gritti, D. (2021). Work less, help out more? The persistence of gender inequality in housework and childcare during UK COVID-19. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 73, 100583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2021.100583 Zhu, J., Stok, M., Bal, M., & de Wit, J. (2022). Mapping the Antecedents, Conditions, and Consequences of Family Pressure that Drives Chinese Queer People into Heterosexual Marriage: A Systematic Review. LGBTQ+ Family: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18(4), 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/27703371.2022.2094521 Downloads Full Text (English) 2023-05-13 Vol. 16 No. 1 (2023): An-Nisa' Journal of Gender Studies Section Articles Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Arif Mustaqim This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. How to Cite Mustaqim, M. A. (2023). Gendered division of labor and women’s double burden: A Bourdieusian perspective on rural plantation work. An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies, 16(1), 25-38. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v16i1.131 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver AMA Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX